If a Git conflict arises late in a sprint due to team collaboration, what is the preferred resolution approach?

The preferred resolution approach of using Copado's automated conflict resolution feature is effective because it allows for a streamlined process that minimizes the time and effort required to resolve conflicts in code. This automation assists in identifying and merging different versions of the code efficiently, which is crucial when conflicts arise late in a sprint. Automated conflict resolution features are designed to handle common scenarios where changes overlap, making it easier for teams to maintain productivity and focus on delivering features rather than getting bogged down in manual resolution processes.

Moreover, relying on automation in conflict resolution can also help ensure consistency and reduce the risk of human error that may occur during manual interventions. In an agile environment, maintaining the pace of development is essential, and automated solutions support continuous integration and delivery by quickly addressing conflicts without disrupting the workflow.

Other options suggest methods that may not be as effective for fostering collaboration and maintaining team momentum. Manual resolution through documentation can be time-consuming and may lead to inconsistencies if not managed well. Having team members work independently might result in different solutions that could complicate the project's overall coherency. Postponing deployment to the next sprint delays progress and can impact the overall timeline and momentum of project deliverables.