Which of the following statements regarding destructive changes is NOT true?

The correct statement regarding destructive changes is that destructive changes can indeed impact previously deployed components. This statement reflects the reality of how destructive changes operate within Salesforce and similar environments. When a component that has been previously deployed is identified as needing deletion, its removal must be handled with careful consideration, as it can affect existing configurations and functionality across the platform.

In contrast to this statement, the notion that destructive changes can impact already deployed components underscores the necessity for teams to plan such changes meticulously. The potential for undesirable consequences, such as losing critical elements of the application's structure or functionality, highlights the importance of understanding these mechanics within change management.

The statement that destructive changes can be rolled back is not universally true depending on how the rollback is approached. In many cases, if no backup was taken before the destruction was executed, restoring those components might pose significant challenges.

Similarly, it is essential to make a backup before committing destructive changes, as once components are removed, recovering them can be complex, if not impossible.

This understanding emphasizes the criticality of managing destructive changes in software development practices, particularly within collaborative environments where multiple contributors may be interacting with the same components. Careful strategy and thorough documentation are key components of a successful deployment process that involves such risks.